So this is what Google Sidewiki looks like?
I wonder if it integrates with Wave...
Monday, 5 October 2009
My First Sidewiki Experiment
Tuesday, 8 September 2009
spider climbing its web
Is there anything prettier than light rain and sunshine and spiders webs?
I've just got a new close up lens so spent the day crawling round the the undergrowth, hanging out in bushes and generally getting too close to snails and spiders and such, much fun!
I've just got a new close up lens so spent the day crawling round the the undergrowth, hanging out in bushes and generally getting too close to snails and spiders and such, much fun!
Thursday, 13 August 2009
[Delicious] nicola osborne wants to share a bookmark with you
Another test of the Delicious plugin changes...
Bookmark: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y2k
nicola osborne's notes: The Year 2000 Problem, or Y2K, was actually a series of short term coding decisions that led many to believe all computer systems would fail on the roll over from 1999 to 2000. In the event most modern systems were fine but some older systems did fail on a number of dates around the Millennium.
You can find more of nicola osborne's bookmarks at
- http://delicious.com/nkl.osborne
---------------------------------
Delivered by Delicious.com
The tastiest bookmarks on the web
Tuesday, 14 July 2009
Torchwood: Children of Earth
A few weeks ago BBC One devoted the whole 9pm to 10pm slot to Torchwood: Children of Earth. And it was good. Mostly...
The thing is that Torchwood has been ticking along rather nicely on BBC3 for some time now but, as with all things that attract a rating, it's seen itself pimped up through the channels in response to it's success. Series One was only on BBC3. Series Two migrated to BBC2 and now, here we are, premiering the third season on BBC1. Except it's only a five part series and there have been a few modifications that pretty much migrated me from the "regular viewer" category to the "devoted upset fan" box.
The first thing to say - and this is free from spoilers - there have been a few changes to Torchwood that are welcome. The budget seems to have ballooned for a start and that's no bad thing at all when you're looking for glossy sci-fi (though I'm not entirely sure why BBC1 viewers must have glossier than BBC2 viewers or BBC3 viewers... are they broadcasting different formats?!). However when Series One began it was clear the writers wanted to set Torchwood fairly far apart from Doctor Who and it primarily achieved this through a huge abundant amount of sex. Straight, gay, alien, even a beastie who shagged drunken Cardiff drinkers to death. And lo, it was rocking. A bit one dimensional but super dirty because Dr Who-niverse plus sex is a pretty exciting little combination, particularly if you were always into the mind-fuck of the immortal traveller more than the tacky plastic of the aliens encountered in abandoned Welsh slate mines. And Jack was gay and Ianto was heading that way and Tosh was falling for that alien/girl from My Family and they killed someone off in the first episode. Wow. Anyway...
That was on BBC3. When things migrated to BBC2 the sex seemed to morph into a sudden incestuous obsession: all the Torchwood team members were still bonking like rabbits but only each other. But that was OK as Captain Jack started more explicitly hanging out with Ianto, Gwen's dull hubby Rhys almost ended up slaughtered (that was an episode full of the hope of escaping suburbia I think) and Owen ended up the weirdly grey-skinned zombie we'd always suspected he was.
So to BBC1 and do we get less violence? Well not really (and here we will have spoilers). We had a man shooting his whole family dead, we had a child melted by weird noise, Jack died 6 times (thanks to You Have Been Watching for the body count) and they debated slaughtering 10% of all children. Also there were some quite nasty gory bits. So no less violence then and actually a welcome blast of tension and cynicism. But where had all the boffing gone? OK it was a week long run and, though not a real-time experience, it was supposed to be taking place over a few days. So that's probably OK. Although the resurrection of attempts to make Gwen and Jack glance sexily at each other continue to fail big time for me. The idea of them as a fake couple is too, well, improbable I think. John Barrowman, cheese-ter that he is, is quite frighteningly turned into a passable actor when faced with a believable love interest, so long may he be written as a character that will flirt with anything but has a particularly eye for the boys. But I digress.
There were four things that made me badly want to scream with annoyance in the week (bigger spoilers ahead):
The thing is that Torchwood has been ticking along rather nicely on BBC3 for some time now but, as with all things that attract a rating, it's seen itself pimped up through the channels in response to it's success. Series One was only on BBC3. Series Two migrated to BBC2 and now, here we are, premiering the third season on BBC1. Except it's only a five part series and there have been a few modifications that pretty much migrated me from the "regular viewer" category to the "devoted upset fan" box.
The first thing to say - and this is free from spoilers - there have been a few changes to Torchwood that are welcome. The budget seems to have ballooned for a start and that's no bad thing at all when you're looking for glossy sci-fi (though I'm not entirely sure why BBC1 viewers must have glossier than BBC2 viewers or BBC3 viewers... are they broadcasting different formats?!). However when Series One began it was clear the writers wanted to set Torchwood fairly far apart from Doctor Who and it primarily achieved this through a huge abundant amount of sex. Straight, gay, alien, even a beastie who shagged drunken Cardiff drinkers to death. And lo, it was rocking. A bit one dimensional but super dirty because Dr Who-niverse plus sex is a pretty exciting little combination, particularly if you were always into the mind-fuck of the immortal traveller more than the tacky plastic of the aliens encountered in abandoned Welsh slate mines. And Jack was gay and Ianto was heading that way and Tosh was falling for that alien/girl from My Family and they killed someone off in the first episode. Wow. Anyway...
That was on BBC3. When things migrated to BBC2 the sex seemed to morph into a sudden incestuous obsession: all the Torchwood team members were still bonking like rabbits but only each other. But that was OK as Captain Jack started more explicitly hanging out with Ianto, Gwen's dull hubby Rhys almost ended up slaughtered (that was an episode full of the hope of escaping suburbia I think) and Owen ended up the weirdly grey-skinned zombie we'd always suspected he was.
So to BBC1 and do we get less violence? Well not really (and here we will have spoilers). We had a man shooting his whole family dead, we had a child melted by weird noise, Jack died 6 times (thanks to You Have Been Watching for the body count) and they debated slaughtering 10% of all children. Also there were some quite nasty gory bits. So no less violence then and actually a welcome blast of tension and cynicism. But where had all the boffing gone? OK it was a week long run and, though not a real-time experience, it was supposed to be taking place over a few days. So that's probably OK. Although the resurrection of attempts to make Gwen and Jack glance sexily at each other continue to fail big time for me. The idea of them as a fake couple is too, well, improbable I think. John Barrowman, cheese-ter that he is, is quite frighteningly turned into a passable actor when faced with a believable love interest, so long may he be written as a character that will flirt with anything but has a particularly eye for the boys. But I digress.
There were four things that made me badly want to scream with annoyance in the week (bigger spoilers ahead):
- Gwen's pregnancy - childcare just isn't exciting telly. And if you're cynically killing kids in the week why suddenly get fluffy? There was a super flexible option - leave Gwen pregnant and alive at the end of the episode but don't assume she safely makes it to full term (as that atrocious coda did). With all that explosive traumatic jumping about there was plenty of opportunity for chaos there. If Torchwood comes back for Season 4 and the baby is just an excuse for Rhys whimsy I will be pissed. If it's a horrible alien manifestation I'll be just about amused but I still think they missed the subtle open ended sane option to not commit...
- The Rift was exactly where please?! You see the thing is that if you set up a universe and it's silly and full of aliens and such you better bloomin' make it make sense. It's like the Buffyverse: it doesn't have to make sense in the real world but it always has to make sense in the fictional universe you are in. So when Torchwood was blown up on Day One what exactly happened to Cardiff? Overrun with Weavels? Alien influx? Dark paramilitary forces running in to steal control of the Rift? You can't blow up a fictional piece of physics that easily Mr Russell T. Davies. It belittles all those who have already seen the show. And it actually mocks Doctor Who fans who also require that part of the Torchwood Universe to work - it's effectively the Tardis charger...
- The Adventures of Captain Jack is the fear I have for Season 4 of Torchwood. After the shows had gone out someone tweeted that the show would be about "Captain Jack bumming his way round the universe. Literally". It's a comment I'd like to call homophobic but frankly the way the week was completed there was little left but Jack being the sexed up Who. Maybe that means Who is turning all suitable for the under 5's but with Stephen Moffat in charge there and Russell T. Davies still involved in Torchwood I have my fears far more about the latter than the former. Davies seems bored of Torchwood before it's barely begun. It's something he's done before: After an amazing cultural phenomenon with Queer as Folk he absolutely devalued that series with the shockingly rubbish Queer as Folk 2. It was like he'd shown up but couldn't be bothered to follow through with believable characters he'd initially set up. The self-destructive tone of Torchwood Season 3 makes me wonder if he's doing the same thing: deciding he likes the telly slot he's managed to open up but he'd rather do a new show instead. File this little rant under "deeply concerned at the ceasing of fun unwholesome Torchwood fun".
- Ianto - why? Why why why? Why kill off just about the only sympathetic and complex character in the show (Gwen is complex but hardly sympathetic; Jack is complexly background-ed but his core personality seems pretty fixed; Ianto was confused about his sexuality, his place professionally, his class role, his relationship). And worse still why did we need to see his family as a sort of excuse for his dead: the gay brother sacrificed for a chavvy family of four. I'll be honest I was ready for the kids to be destroyed but in no way ready to give up a well written and acted character. It's a strangely homophobic move for me - you've had your coming out moment, you've had a relationship and now we have nothing left to write for you. That's a fairly bleak picture of inclusion in mainstream drama if ever I saw one. Maybe Russell wanted to reduce the amount of slash fiction out there... I suspect the opposite will be the outcome. As much of a feminist as I am I'd rather have a man-who-sleeps-with-men, a feisty woman and a pansexual alien as my leads. Not one depressed alien and a mommy. Gah!
- Take a more Buffy view of your universe. There are no sacred cows but a relationship that's stable across two or three series and then goes badly wrong is much more interesting and surprising than one that is stable only for a few months. You can't keep all characters happy but you should let a bit of stability amek for plain fun episodes short on soap factors. Otherwise you should be writing "continuing drama" instead.
- To help you tie things up sensibly why don't you do something outrageously unusual: hire some writers who actually did science at A-level or at university. It would give the show a short of Star Trek-like big ideas + vague plausibility that would help tidy those endings up no end. What is actually happening and being researched is far more thrilling that what sits in the mind of a writer on their 20th plotline for a sci-fi format. So, subscriptions to New Scientist, Nature and Wired and a few accessible but informative tech/science mags would be a start. Some actual science journals would knock your socks off and a scientist on the writing team... well that might just flip you over the edge so that 100% of a series could be good, not just the first 70% of it!
Wednesday, 3 June 2009
Friday, 22 May 2009
Eurovision 2009
Eurovision 2009 was ace this year. Click through to Flickr to have a look at the pics or go to http://www.suchprettyeyes.com to see all of our neat wiki pages and blogs and such.
Friday, 20 March 2009
many moons
I seem to be walking home at dusk more and more lately. Not due to leaving work early but because the first dawnings of spring mean it's not quite dark at 7ish anymore and that is a wonderful thing indeed.
Walking home the other night I saw this beautiful sight: all the many paper lampshades in the Salisbury Centre were glowing softly whilst a powerfully bright full moon shon out above in that crisp spring sky. You can only partly get the idea from the picture but it was really magical.
Walking home the other night I saw this beautiful sight: all the many paper lampshades in the Salisbury Centre were glowing softly whilst a powerfully bright full moon shon out above in that crisp spring sky. You can only partly get the idea from the picture but it was really magical.
Saturday, 14 March 2009
BarCamp Session 6 - Summary of day, highlights etc.
This is a summary session. Everyone had a very unique experience: Ewen got pitched to at the urinals!
Comments, blog posts, and anything else should be put out there with the tag BarCampScotland.
Mike Madnicks talk was about making the best stuff free and the scarce stuff paid for. He was saying don't freak out about piracy but work out how to make money from attention. How to make things more productive and less intrusive.
Ewen recommends Jeff Jarvis: What Would Google Do, JJ says do what you do best and link to everything else.
Social Networking Sites - and multiple identities on them - how you negotiate that divide. Ewen adds that you must be out there if you're pitching for money. If you want to be getting money for social network stuff, apps etc. you need to be there.
Breastlife - a gadget that's on it's way and there was a session about online marketing etc. How to mix mediums etc. Shadowpuppets on Youtube was suggested.
Mobile app session - talk about different price structures, iPhone, Nokia and Android all vary. Time to use was defined as "latte time" - how can your app be useful in the time it takes to order a coffee.
Hyper local news - Ewen says lots of potential there as BBC Trust blocked development of local stuff so a huge opportunity. Apparently he's seen an idea today he may commission on this theme. IN fact he's seen 3 so worth the train ticket for him apparently..
That's pretty much it but I'll reflect later on what I thought I think... for now off to the bar with vouchers...
Comments, blog posts, and anything else should be put out there with the tag BarCampScotland.
Mike Madnicks talk was about making the best stuff free and the scarce stuff paid for. He was saying don't freak out about piracy but work out how to make money from attention. How to make things more productive and less intrusive.
Ewen recommends Jeff Jarvis: What Would Google Do, JJ says do what you do best and link to everything else.
Social Networking Sites - and multiple identities on them - how you negotiate that divide. Ewen adds that you must be out there if you're pitching for money. If you want to be getting money for social network stuff, apps etc. you need to be there.
Breastlife - a gadget that's on it's way and there was a session about online marketing etc. How to mix mediums etc. Shadowpuppets on Youtube was suggested.
Mobile app session - talk about different price structures, iPhone, Nokia and Android all vary. Time to use was defined as "latte time" - how can your app be useful in the time it takes to order a coffee.
Hyper local news - Ewen says lots of potential there as BBC Trust blocked development of local stuff so a huge opportunity. Apparently he's seen an idea today he may commission on this theme. IN fact he's seen 3 so worth the train ticket for him apparently..
That's pretty much it but I'll reflect later on what I thought I think... for now off to the bar with vouchers...
BarCamp Session 5 - Squeak Smalltalk
This was a small but interesting session about the operating system/programming language/useful idea that is Squeak Smalltalk which is built on Smalltalk - a gui developed at Xerox Park back in the late 70's/early 80s. Squeak smalltalk is powerful but it is so adaptable that it was quite difficult to demonstrate (especially as there were problems with connecting laptop to projector).
We saw the "morphic interface" and the editing and programming of objects. Also saw Croquet - a virtual world built on smalltalk in a very SL way. Interesting but at an alpha development stage at the moment so not easy to see.
More practically Scratch - a basic and very widely used visual programming tool - is built on Squeak Smalltalk, and Sophie - an ebooks authoring tool is also built on Squeak Smalltalk.
We saw the "morphic interface" and the editing and programming of objects. Also saw Croquet - a virtual world built on smalltalk in a very SL way. Interesting but at an alpha development stage at the moment so not easy to see.
More practically Scratch - a basic and very widely used visual programming tool - is built on Squeak Smalltalk, and Sophie - an ebooks authoring tool is also built on Squeak Smalltalk.
BarCamp Session 4 - Mobile visual interactivity
My next session I get to be a slightly more passive person again. This one is on "Visual Interactivity" and is being given by Jeff Ballinger who works for a company called Mobileacuity and he says we should throw things at him if he gets too salesy...
Visual interactivity is the topic up for discussion.
Background:
- Most people have phones they use for voice calls
- Most people send text messages
- Many have cameras on their phone. In a more regular group of punters there are a few less than in this room
- About 5% (if that) have visited a web site on their phone (in our room about 60%)
- Very very few folk have downloaded apps or games (we're much higher than average)
What are the implications for folk on the street. Cameras are used widely. More sophisticated things like browsers etc. are not used very much.
Jeff's company works in brand marketing spaces. They want to use mobile with other mediums. They really want wide usage for it to be useful. It must be inclusive and it cannot put people off (real danger in brand marketing). But perhaps these issues raise the difference between good and bad mobile content.
We're seeing a graph. Most now have camera phones.
Showing 3D barcode: has to be printed on original media. Nice to redirect what it points to. The reason most QR type codes are fairly static. This is to do IPR. NeoMedia Technologies have a patent for any redirection via an image. They did this in about 1995 so did originate in this stuff but it makes it hard to get into it now. There is a real usability barrier here as well. How can you tell that
In 2008, 166.6m handsets in Western Europe are registered for MMS usage - 95% of phones. And ages 16-34 generally know how to send MMS.
Recognition
Very simple form of interactivity. Take picture, recognize and then send back content. Q, basic. You take a picture and get sent back data. It's handy but it's really not that useful or exciting. Only great if loads of media are involved. The number for this sort of interactivity has to be communicated to users somehow. Questions raised about trust issues. Any call to action tends to be situational. Mobileacuity tend not to put out a number for responses to help for that.
Image Zoning
A bit more sophisticated. You take a picture with the centre focused on an action point (e.g. Vodafone guess the goal scoring point interaction). Offers better and wider possibilities. another example done by agency AKQA for Nike PhotoiD. A way to customize shoes by taking pictures of the colours you like, you get sent back a mocked up shoe in that colour (from set palate) and a link to buy. Colour analysis being used as input for mobile shopping.
Blue Screening
As in the movies (or in the beach of old!) you can star in an image. You could take pictures of yourself pocking head through a sign and then the service can return content (e.g. a music video) using this. Limited by physical location of boards etc.
Facefinder
Is latest idea on this. It just uses a regular image so can be used better for social apps. Now getting a demo from some friendly faces in the front row! ;) A picture is taken and sent off to the company servers. And a video gets sent back. Really quite fun. Cost of download of video depends on package. 500k is about the video size. Contracts vary. Vodafone do inclusive data. T-Mobile and 3 have add ons but inexpensive and good take up. Other operators not such easy models yet. You can do viral things to build on that content. Could use GPS into apps on some phones but phone dependent. Mobileacuity is focusing on visual end, apps specialists build the apps.
It's very easy to find face like features in an image. There is some false positive confusion here. Can be tricky to separate real from unreal faces. Finding the edge of a face without a fixed template is also tricky.
Now watching demo video from MobileExpo this year. This prompts a question about serious uses other than teenage silliness. There is a project that Jeff is working on that is a public information service (but he can't tell us about it) but there are also ways of getting data on products and services. Snaptel in the US (in Snaptel Explorer) lets you take a picture of DVD, product etc. and then link to tons of data - real time data when making purchasing decisions.
One useful implication could be to tag a face and then search based on it in image searching tools (some common ground here with iPhoto face recognition).
Visual search over text search has an advantage in terms of specificity. e.g. search for Paris and you get the city, you get Paris Hilton etc. If you take a picture of the Eiffel Tower you'll only get info on the Eiffel Tower. Talk here that a theatre listings could be returned from a picture of that theatre.
More demos are being handed out. I am pausing over them as my data package is not that great.
Discussion: there are manual cut out options and web based ideas. Mobileacuity are in discussion with various agencies about options. Someone asked about Facebook - send from phone and return to Facebook or similar.
There are several competitors. All but one uses a licensed software option that limits options. Mobileacuity uses something different and is leading in UK (and only in UK it seems) with clients including Ogilvy, Joule, Nokia, Pepsi, Vodafone, BBC, etc. Mobileacuity is looking at a web service API in a few months. Once it's finished it will be rolled out more widely.
Visual interactivity is the topic up for discussion.
Background:
- Most people have phones they use for voice calls
- Most people send text messages
- Many have cameras on their phone. In a more regular group of punters there are a few less than in this room
- About 5% (if that) have visited a web site on their phone (in our room about 60%)
- Very very few folk have downloaded apps or games (we're much higher than average)
What are the implications for folk on the street. Cameras are used widely. More sophisticated things like browsers etc. are not used very much.
Jeff's company works in brand marketing spaces. They want to use mobile with other mediums. They really want wide usage for it to be useful. It must be inclusive and it cannot put people off (real danger in brand marketing). But perhaps these issues raise the difference between good and bad mobile content.
We're seeing a graph. Most now have camera phones.
Showing 3D barcode: has to be printed on original media. Nice to redirect what it points to. The reason most QR type codes are fairly static. This is to do IPR. NeoMedia Technologies have a patent for any redirection via an image. They did this in about 1995 so did originate in this stuff but it makes it hard to get into it now. There is a real usability barrier here as well. How can you tell that
In 2008, 166.6m handsets in Western Europe are registered for MMS usage - 95% of phones. And ages 16-34 generally know how to send MMS.
Recognition
Very simple form of interactivity. Take picture, recognize and then send back content. Q, basic. You take a picture and get sent back data. It's handy but it's really not that useful or exciting. Only great if loads of media are involved. The number for this sort of interactivity has to be communicated to users somehow. Questions raised about trust issues. Any call to action tends to be situational. Mobileacuity tend not to put out a number for responses to help for that.
Image Zoning
A bit more sophisticated. You take a picture with the centre focused on an action point (e.g. Vodafone guess the goal scoring point interaction). Offers better and wider possibilities. another example done by agency AKQA for Nike PhotoiD. A way to customize shoes by taking pictures of the colours you like, you get sent back a mocked up shoe in that colour (from set palate) and a link to buy. Colour analysis being used as input for mobile shopping.
Blue Screening
As in the movies (or in the beach of old!) you can star in an image. You could take pictures of yourself pocking head through a sign and then the service can return content (e.g. a music video) using this. Limited by physical location of boards etc.
Facefinder
Is latest idea on this. It just uses a regular image so can be used better for social apps. Now getting a demo from some friendly faces in the front row! ;) A picture is taken and sent off to the company servers. And a video gets sent back. Really quite fun. Cost of download of video depends on package. 500k is about the video size. Contracts vary. Vodafone do inclusive data. T-Mobile and 3 have add ons but inexpensive and good take up. Other operators not such easy models yet. You can do viral things to build on that content. Could use GPS into apps on some phones but phone dependent. Mobileacuity is focusing on visual end, apps specialists build the apps.
It's very easy to find face like features in an image. There is some false positive confusion here. Can be tricky to separate real from unreal faces. Finding the edge of a face without a fixed template is also tricky.
Now watching demo video from MobileExpo this year. This prompts a question about serious uses other than teenage silliness. There is a project that Jeff is working on that is a public information service (but he can't tell us about it) but there are also ways of getting data on products and services. Snaptel in the US (in Snaptel Explorer) lets you take a picture of DVD, product etc. and then link to tons of data - real time data when making purchasing decisions.
One useful implication could be to tag a face and then search based on it in image searching tools (some common ground here with iPhoto face recognition).
Visual search over text search has an advantage in terms of specificity. e.g. search for Paris and you get the city, you get Paris Hilton etc. If you take a picture of the Eiffel Tower you'll only get info on the Eiffel Tower. Talk here that a theatre listings could be returned from a picture of that theatre.
More demos are being handed out. I am pausing over them as my data package is not that great.
Discussion: there are manual cut out options and web based ideas. Mobileacuity are in discussion with various agencies about options. Someone asked about Facebook - send from phone and return to Facebook or similar.
There are several competitors. All but one uses a licensed software option that limits options. Mobileacuity uses something different and is leading in UK (and only in UK it seems) with clients including Ogilvy, Joule, Nokia, Pepsi, Vodafone, BBC, etc. Mobileacuity is looking at a web service API in a few months. Once it's finished it will be rolled out more widely.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
